This is the talk page of a redirect that and is now a redirect. However, this page is currently at RfD which has disabled the redirect. Discussion about this redirect should occur at the RfD subject page linked to at List of most massive exoplanets.
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Recent analysis showed that the so-called light source from what appeared to be HD 100546 b was from a more diffuse structure.
The visible part of the source may not have been part of such a body itself, but the disturbance in disk caused by what appears to be a much smaller and more distant body (c) completely embedded in the dust shroud, which isn't confirmed by the way.[1]Eric Nelson27 (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge it with a different page instead
This page was was redirected to List of largest exoplanets. I don't agree with this though. Most objects that were in this list aren't in the largest exoplanets list and mass is different from radius. It could be redirected to List of brown dwarfs instead, as many objects from here are in that list as well and any object with a mass above 13 MJ is likely just a BD orbiting a star (there were a lot of them here). Diamantinasaurus (talk) 23:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]