Talk:Linn Isobarik

Linn Isobarik has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 24, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Linn Isobarik appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Linn Isobarik loudspeaker (pictured) is named after the isobaric loudspeaker?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Linn Isobarik.

Wikipedia

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

PMS

The acronym 'PMS' should be expanded, as for DMS. It would also be useful to compare and contrast them. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, thanks. Definition expanded. However, as the nature of the PMS and DMS are quite different, and these differences tend to be generic and are mentioned in active loudspeaker, I'm not sure how to compare them. Regards, -- Ohc ^¡digame! 07:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Linn Isobarik/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 05:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 05:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

NOTE: Please respond, below this image review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! — Cirt (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linn Kan.jpg = image transferred to Commons. Tagged as requiring review over there. Not done
File:Linn Isobarik DMS loudspeaker (with in-built crossover) in a domestic setting.jpg = OTRS confirmation on Commons. Y
File:Linn Isobarik DMS loudspeaker enclosure.png = original image on Commons. Y
File:Linn Products D20-LP-1 tweeter, sourced from Hiquphon in Denmark.jpg = original image on Commons. Y
File:Linn Isobarik tweeters taken out of different Isobariks.jpg = image transferred to Commons. Tagged as requiring review over there. Probably a simple matter as it already has OTRS confirmation. Not done.
File:Linn Isobarik loudspeaker crossover - early version inside isobaric chamber.jpg = image transferred to Commons. Tagged as requiring review over there. Probably a simple matter as it already has OTRS confirmation. Not done.
File:Linn Isobarik loudspeaker crossover from 1988 - Andrea12.jpg = image transferred to Commons. Tagged as requiring review over there. Probably a simple matter as it already has OTRS confirmation. Not done.
File:Linn Isobarik loudspeaker external crossover in stand.jpg = image transferred to Commons. Tagged as requiring review over there. Probably a simple matter as it already has OTRS confirmation. Not done.

NOTE: Please respond, below this image review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! — Cirt (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linn Kan.jpg is one I created myself, so there really ought not to be any issue. All the others have OTRS tickets, so review should only be a formality – this is not something I am in control of. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 06:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, one option would be you could try posting to commons:Commons:Village pump and/or commons:Commons:Help desk for assistance with those particular images. You're right, review is probably a formality and just a matter of removing those pesky transfer tags, but best to go the proper routes in this case. — Cirt (talk) 06:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request made. Hopefully this won't take long. Regards, -- Ohc ^¡digame! 07:21, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stability review

Upon inspection of article edit history, going back over one month, I see one instance of vandalism. The user was blocked indef. Just something to keep an eye on. Y.
Checked talk page edit history. No issues or conflicts there. Y.

— Cirt (talk) 05:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citations review

I've added some cites needed tags that need to be addressed.
I'd really appreciate it if the cites could be standardized using WP:CIT templates. There is a bit of inconsistency in formatting from one citation to the next, makes it a bit confusing and more difficult to evaluate the citations. Using WP:CIT templates would help increase standardization and make it much easier for me to evaluate the adherence of citations to WP:RS, and WP:V, and other site policies.

— Cirt (talk) 01:18, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 10:10, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Okay, that makes it easier. Several cites are missing fields, such as accessdate, date, publisher, author, etc. — Cirt (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All citations fields have been populated where the metadata exists, citations have been resequenced, and I have now created archives for the citations where these are original content. Note that courtesy links are for the purposes of WP:V during reviews, and have not been archived due to possible copyright implications. I believe that by doing so, we obviate the need to include access dates, which are supposedly useful for retrieval of content from dynamic pages. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 03:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am ejecting to this review page all the courtesy links used in the article:

Harris, Steve (November 2011). "Iconic Hi-fi – Audio Milestones: Linn Isobarik" (PDF). Hi-Fi News. courtesy link. pp. 132–136.

"Test Bench – Linn Isobarik DMS" (PDF). Hi-Fi for Pleasure. courtesy link. April c.1980, date indiscernible. pp. 61–64. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)

"Isobarik Speaker Stand Manual" (PDF). Linn Products, courtesy link to private website. June 1986.

"Linn Isobarik DMS" (PDF). Linn Products, courtesy link to private website.

"Linn DMS Isobarik Loudspeaker" (PDF). Audiophile Systems, Courtesy link to private website. 1980.

CW (February 1980). "Isobarbarism" (PDF). Popular Hi-Fi. courtesy link. p. 20.

"Triumphal Tri-amping" (PDF). Popular Hi-Fi. courtesy link. February 1980. pp. 119–121.

"Isobarik Aktiv Crossover Owners Manual" (PDF). Linn Products, courtesy link to private website.

-- Ohc ^¡digame! 04:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Certainly www.webcitation.org is much more durable than www.wordpress.com. — Cirt (talk) 04:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passed as GA

Thanks for being so responsive to my recommendations, above. The image thing is not a big deal, hopefully someone will help fix the formatting soon of those pages on Commons. Great job, — Cirt (talk) 06:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Date missing for the Hi-Fi for Pleasure article

The date on the Hi-Fi for Pleasure article was throwing errors, so I commented it out and templated it. --mathieu ottawa (talk) 06:50, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]