Talk:Le Règne Animal/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs) 14:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious large mistakes

There are no obvious large mistakes. In addition, this article lacks {{POW}}, {{unreferenced}}, {{citation needed}} or tags of similar sort.

Punctuation, capitalization, spelling, grammar and prose

The punctuation, capitalization, spelling and grammar is correct. This article talks about the book in good prose.

Lead section

The lead section accurately condenses the article and gives a good, proper introduction communicated through prose.

Referencing and plagiarism

The referencing is correct. There are all reliable sources. The article does not copy text without attributing its source. It doesn't plagiarize at all in any way.

Comprehensiveness

This article is broad and discusses every important part in the book. It is very comprehensive. It occasionally goes into detail, but only because that is necessary.

Point of view

This article is written from a neutral point of view.

Stability

This article is stable, so stable that there is not a single undo in its history.

Overview

This article is great to be a good article. I have a suggestion that is not part of the Good article criteria, but is still valid. Only five users has contributed to this article, and User:Chiswick Chap has made the overwhelming majority of edits. It would be nice if other editors would make lots of edits and help a lot. However, this article is still good article material. This article is perfect to be a good article.

Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You welcome! I only did what was right. This article should have been a good article after the first review! Gug01 (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]