Talk:LeEco
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Material from Le.com was split to LeEco on 9 November 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Le.com. |
| Material from LeEco was split to LeSports on 10 December 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Numerous Minor Grammar Errors
This article is laced with small errors with prepositions and conjunction errors that need to be fixed. It sounds like it was written by someone who had learned English second hand. While not a big deal, it interrupts the flow, and is confusing.L3X1 (talk) 22:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Suspicious
This whole article says suspiciously little about the EXTENSIVE media coverage that suggests the company is close to collapse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.155.31.226 (talk) 02:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- IMO that is the news poking its nose into what they oughn't and scaremongering. L3X1 (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- well, no, thats exactly what journalists do. if a company cannot stand up to investigation, they have a problem. oh, look, they have a problem. funny how that works.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC)