Talk:Kolab Now

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Privacy Section?

Most of the privacy section is actually about surveillance and legal interception. It should therefore be split up into two sections since privacy laws do not protect against legal interception and surveillance. --2001:1620:F00:81ED:5D62:1752:F5F8:E4D2 (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually privacy laws provide the regulation of legal interception, at least in Switzerland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.197.229.16 (talk) 16:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've now changed the title of that section to "Privacy of customer data", which I think is clearer and accurate. Gronky (talk) 20:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability?

This article relies entirely on references self-published by the subject of the article and associated organizations.

A quick google search makes me doubt that it meets notability requirements, but at the least it needs better references. Sbs9 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've improved various parts of the article just now,[1] but I've run out of time and the lack of sources is still a weak point. A quick Google search does indeed turn up articles that confirm notability, and articles that contain information not included in this article. One example is this 2015 interview with Georg Greve:
But I'm out of time. I hope someone does a few web searches and adds sources. Gronky (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Kolab into Kolab Now

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was not merged. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

The product has been merged into Kolab Now — kashmīrī TALK 20:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose on the grounds that Kolab Now focusses on a service/company, while Kolab focusses on the software; the current arrangement seems to work. Klbrain (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.