Talk:Kimmirut

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

{{movenotice|Kimmirut|Arviat, Nunavut#Requested move}}

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Arviat, Nunavut which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 01:15, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I dispute record high

The record high temperature recorded in Kimmirut seems ridiculously high for the area. Iqaluit's record high, for comparison, is 26.7. I don't have proof it's wrong, but common sense tells me it is, comparing to nearby areas. Alex of Canada (talk) 07:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Alex of Canada[reply]

I agree, those records are in wide disagreement with every other source regarding the area. Besides, the source linked in the table is no longer reachable and as such impossible to check. A corresponding (and working) MSN link is https://www.msn.com/en-gb/weather/records/kimmirutnunavutcanada/we-city?q=kimmirut-nunavut and has much more reasonable (and different) data. I have no time to update right now, so at the moment I just deleted the "record high" line. --Eylenbosch (talk) 22:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kimmirut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]