Talk:Kevin Holland (Australian politician)

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kevin Holland (fighter) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. There is no opposition for moving the article on the politician, and there is a consensus for declaring the fighter the primary topic for Kevin Holland below. (non-admin closure) IffyChat -- 18:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kevin Holland should redirect to the fighter instead of an unknown politician. Marty2Hotty2 (talk) 09:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, support disambiguation page instead. The politician is certainly not the primary topic, but I see no evidence that the fighter is either. Frickeg (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: @Frickeg: The view count for the fighter will be significantly higher if a disambiguation page were to be created. Making it default to the fighter instead will prevent that. That's why I'm for redirecting directly to the fighter. The fighter gets 3300+ daily views. According to page views, "Kevin Holland" has 24 page views. People will be searching for the fighter and there are no other Kevin Hollands than the politician. Marty2Hotty2 (talk) 01:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
View count is a poor method for determining a primary topic, especially when one of these people is active now and the other has been dead for 25 years. From my reading of the article, the fighter is nowhere near prominent enough to be the primary topic here. Frickeg (talk) 06:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.