Talk:Ker v. California

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

names 'n' stuff

George Douglas and Diane Ker ...

Is his full name George Douglas Ker? Could be made more explicit.

The citation Diane Ker et ux. is surprising, as uxor means 'wife'! �—Tamfang (talk) 00:44, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

5-4 or 9-0

In this case 4 justices were concurent/dissent to the majority's opinion and it is written that The case was decided on June 10, 1963, by a vote of 5-4.(not 9-0). So, we consider that concurent/dissent is an against vote. I am agree with it. But I have a reasonable question: why in Lawrence v. Texas we see such a statement: In the 6–3 ruling, the Court struck down the sodomy law in Texas and.... In Lawrence O'Connor was concurent/dissent, so it must be 5-4, and not 6-3. Where is a mistake, in this article or in Lawrence?? Do we consider a concurent/dissent like favor vote or against vote to the majority's opinion?? 217.76.1.22 (talk) 13:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Ker v. California

names 'n' stuff

5-4 or 9-0

Navigation menu

Search