Talk:KVCR-DT/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 12:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will be reviewing this article, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Good luck to the editors! Got a knack for reviewing your articles Sammi, they're amazing! Arconning (talk · contribs)
    • @Sammi Brie: Here are my comments, hopefully they will be addressed.
      • That ping wasn't signed, so it didn't come through. Anyway, everything should be handled, Arconning. One item you suggested is incorrect. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 17:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

Lede

  • As public stations signed on in the Los Angeles area, , hyperlink Los Angeles.

History

  • even though trustees were at first lukewarm about the concept., change lukewarm to something more formal like unsure.
    • Reworded.
  • Several sites, including Sunset Ridge (used by KHOF-TV),, hyperlink Sunset Ridge to Sunset Ridge, Victorville, California.
    • Those aren't the same place. The coords for KHOF-TV are 34°11'15", -117°41'58", which today is known as Brindle Mountain but is identified on all the broadcast paperwork I've seen as Sunset Ridge.
  • relocating the station out of the only home it had ever known, informal, please change.
  • would soon need to dip into the principal of the stations' endowment to cover operating expenses., possibly change dip to something more formal. Can be discussed though!
    • Both done.

Funding

  • No issues. But if grant monies be changed to grant money, that would be okay!
    • Reworded.

Local programming

  • No issues. Pass.

Technical information

  • No issues. Pass.

Refs

  • All references are reliable, would be nice if some of the unlinked references would have a web reference to back it up :) But it's alright if not.
    • These are, as you might expect, NewsBank-only. Unlike the last two articles, however, the papers in question aren't in GenealogyBank for those years (the Press-Enterprise only goes up through 1986 and only has gotten there in the last few months), or at all (Business Press). The San Bernardino County Sun is unusual for Newspapers.com as it dries up in 1998. Some of the pages in recent years are likely available online.
Spotchecks
  • Earwig and manual check shows up nothing.

Images

  • Images have proper licensing and are relevant to the article's topic.

Misc.

  • No ongoing edit war, neutral, broad in coverage.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.