This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. The baseball player was shown to have an apparent lead in usage (albeit not as firm as I'd like), and the long-term significance was cited to support a no-primary situation in the first place, and thus does not sufficiently counterweigh the usage lead. In the end, the scales are tipped towards the baseball player remaining primary. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:54, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – at first I was leaning opposed just based on page views, but Roman Spinner has a solid argument. Juan Castro only takes up around 1 and 1/2 pages on Google Search, suggesting to me that he does not meet criteria for primary topic. cookie monster75502:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relister comment There seems to be an overwhelming lack of confidence in the baseball player being primary. In addition, I tried to do some math with the cited massviews, and the baseball player only has 62% of the pageviews, not 81%; not a supermajority to me. Any other comments on the opposer's cited pageview figures? — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While we have a number of articles linked on the Juan Castro (disambiguation) page, only a small portion actually seem to ever be referred to by "Juan Castro" in common usage -- it is perfectly reasonable to have someone like Juan de Castro linked, for example, but it does not raise a competing claim to the base name if the base name is not used to refer to the subject. Of what remains, there appears to be a clear primary topic going by page views. Otherwise, the !votes just seem to point out the existence of the other pages, which in and of itself is not a reason to not have a primary topic (otherwise we wouldn't need a concept of a primary topic at all).--Yaksar(let's chat)07:17, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
