Talk:Joseph Giarratano

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

It would help to have a truly reliable source, such as a magazine or newspaper article.DGG 09:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about a decision of the United States Supreme Court. Murray vs. Giarratano, 492 US 1 (1989)

Is that good enough for you?

Sam Sloan 17:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

McCarthy - dubious

We are citing a piece written by McCarthy in the Washington Post. Even that newspaper has filed it under "op-ed", and it is a short piece. What credentials does the writer possess? I have no verification of this particular circumstance, but as a generalisation pretty much anyone can get an op-ed published. Believe me, I am one of them and, as with the McCarthy piece, mine have been campaigning efforts. (A long time ago, on issues to which I do not contribute here, I hasten to add). - Sitush (talk) 23:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that an Op-Ed piece needs to be identified as such. Have looked for more sources that are reporting on events, rather than offering opinion.Parkwells (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

op eds can be informative. In this case McCarthy personally interviewed Giarratano on at least 4 separate occasions while he was on death row. Syndicated Columnist James J Kilpatrick (no liberal), wrote several columns about this case. Kilpatrick read the trial record, appellate record, and interview the states Attorney General about the case as well as communicated with Giarratano. Kilpatricks conclusions were similar to McCarthy's. Joedion! (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary Sources

Here are some secondary sources regarding Joe Evidence book, Detective Division: City of Norfolk police Department (Oct 1, 1979) "The Consequences of False Confessions: Deprivations of Liberty and Miscarriages of Justice in the Age of Psychological Interrgoation", Leo and Ofshe, 88J. Crim.L and Criminology, 429 (1998) "The Truth About False Confessions and Adversary Scholarship" Leo and Ofshe, Crim. Law Bulletin, Vol 37, Num 4, 293 (2001) "The Clemency Process in Virginia", Walter McFarlane, 27 Ce. Rich L. Rev. 241 (1993) "The Psychology of Interrogation, Confessions and Testimony" By Gisli Gudjonsson (1992) "The Psychology of Interrogation and Confessions: a Handbook" by Gisli Gudjonsson "Keeping Faith, Keeping On: The Prison Years of Joe Giarratano" by Colman McCarthy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbaranelsonnelson (talk • contribs) 15:28, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What content do you want to add to the article that is backed by these secondary sources? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:42, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing to Joe now and will ask him that question. Thank you. Barb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbaranelsonnelson (talk • contribs) 16:59, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that if you are adding the material, it's up to you to obtain and verify the sources. That is, you should not be editing by proxy on behalf of Mr. Giarratano. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:09, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Giarratano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131224113559/http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/VALib/v50_n1/reviews.html to http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/VALib/v50_n1/reviews.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Joseph Giarratano

Untitled

McCarthy - dubious

Secondary Sources

External links modified

Navigation menu

Search