(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
Most of the sources are primary links to Joomla's website, consisting of mainly release statements and forum posts. Very few third-party sources are used.
Fail
(c) (original research)
The reviewer has left no comments here
Undetermined
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)
The reviewer has left no comments here
Undetermined
Broad in its coverage:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (major aspects)
The article mostly focuses on the product itself and community, but not its reception among the larger public.
Fail
(b) (focused)
The reviewer has left no comments here
Undetermined
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
The reviewer has left no comments here
Undetermined
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
No daily changes. Passed
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
Both images are properly tagged
Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
The Joomla code, community, culture image seems to be rather insignificant and is more fit for a marketing presentation.
Fail
Result
Result
Notes
Fail
Sorry, but the sources situation is unacceptable. I have to quickfail this article. I would recommend taking some time to research coverage of Joomla in reliable sources; Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources is a good place to start.
Discussion
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.