Talk:John Williams (gastroenterologist)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 14 October 2021
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to John Williams (gastroenterologist) per discussion (non-admin closure) –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
John Williams (researcher) → John Williams (medical researcher) – Ambiguous with numerous other articles. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 03:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 22:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Whilst I agree in principle, the new title should be John Williams (gastroenterologist), which is what he actually is. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 13 October 2021 (UTC)]
- Based on this profile, most of his research appears to be outside the field of gastroenterology (which I suspect is why it wasn't used as a disambiguator already). 207.161.86.162 (talk) 01:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- The article suggests gastroenterology is still at the core of his work. He was Professor of Medicine at Swansea and is still a consultant gastroenterologist, so I don't think "medical researcher" is really appropriate. That's usually applied to medical scientists who aren't practising doctors. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. It should be John Williams (gastroenterologist). From my point of view, he's clearly a gastroenterologist above anything else he may also be involved in. And I imagine the general public sees him as a doctor rather than a researcher, but that may just be my perception. Dr. Vogel (talk) 17:07, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- The article suggests gastroenterology is still at the core of his work. He was Professor of Medicine at Swansea and is still a consultant gastroenterologist, so I don't think "medical researcher" is really appropriate. That's usually applied to medical scientists who aren't practising doctors. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Based on this profile, most of his research appears to be outside the field of gastroenterology (which I suspect is why it wasn't used as a disambiguator already). 207.161.86.162 (talk) 01:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Whilst I agree in principle, the new title should be John Williams (gastroenterologist), which is what he actually is. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 13 October 2021 (UTC)]
- Support John Williams (gastroenterologist) per above. I agree the current title is ambiguous and that "medical researcher" is still problematic. We don't have a date-of-birth, so (physician, born 19XX) isn't possible. (gastroenterologist) is the best of multiple mediocre options. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 20:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.