Talk:John Rawls

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 13, 2009Peer reviewReviewed

Possessive form of name

Is there any consensus on the correct form of "Rawls" in the possessive? Not that it is a major issue; however, I wonder if there is any definitive answer since both "Rawls'" and "Rawls's" are used within this article and other publications alike. RyanQuinlan (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why is editing of this reverted? It seems a bit - um... quirky? to have two different possessive forms within an article. I personally don't really care which form is decided on, but I really do think it should be consistent within the page. TMagen (talk) 12:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Rawls's" is more common in academic philosophy, although it may depend on the editing convention of publishers and journals.50.191.21.222 (talk) 00:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rawls discussed in revised article.

I have described Rawls's practice of Instrumental and value rationality in the article so named. I invite comments.TBR-qed (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stutter

I have been told on occasion that I stutter, however I am not a stutterer. Casual speech which may involve stuttering does not mean that one is a stutterer, I just found a audio of a lecture by Rawls in 1984 and there is no trace of a stutter. 98.4.124.117 (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Understanding differences helps one understand Rawls.

This Instrumental and value rationality link confronts Rawls's views with critiques by Nozick, Gouinlock, and Sen.TBR-qed (talk) 16:19, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]