Talk:John Francis Jackson/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 07:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Progression

• Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
• Version of the article when review was closed: [2]]

Technical review

• Citations: - the citation check tool reveals no errors (no action required)
• Disambiguations: none found - [3] (no action required)
• Linkrot: Ext links all work - [4] (no action required)
• Alt text: All images have alt text (although this is not a requirement for GA anyway) - [5] (no action required)

Criteria

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

  • I made one change which I think works better, but please check it to see that you're happy with it.

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  No edit wars etc.:

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

  • IMO this interesting article easily meets the GA criteria so I'm happy to pass. Good work Ian. Anotherclown (talk) 07:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
    • Many tks mate. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)