Talk:Jesus College, Oxford/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:55, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Inital comments

After several quick read-throughs this article appears to be at or about GA-standard, and I'm not spotted (yet?) any major "holds"; I'll therefore continue with an in depth review section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. Pyrotec (talk) 13:42, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• History -

• Appears to be compliant with WP:WIAGA.

• Location and buildings -

....to be continued. Pyrotec (talk) 19:14, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Appears to be compliant.

• People associated with the college -

• Appears to be compliant.

....to be continued. Pyrotec (talk) 10:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

• Student life & Silverware -

• These appear to be compliant.

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well illustrated

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

The problems that led to this article being delisted, particularly lack of adequate citations, appear to have been addressed. I'm therefore awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations, on re-acheiving Ga-status. Pyrotec (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2009 (UTC)