Talk:Jessica Anderson (writer)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rosiestep (talk · contribs) 00:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

I'll start the review within a week. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Lede

• At just 4 sentences, the lede is too short and doesn't give an adequate overview of the article sections.

Early life

• wl Queensland at first mention
• The section's first sentence doesn't need to be a stand-alone paragraph.

Stories from the Warm Zone and Sydney Stories

• "first and only autobiographical work": can you add a reference?

The Last Man's Head

• I don't think the last sentence needs to be a stand-alone paragraph.

Further reading

• Could use a trim

Perry Middlemiss, Well done. There are few recommendations for improvement here, but please do ping me when you're ready for me to look at it again. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

I'll work my way through the review items and let you know when I'm ready for a re-review. Thanks. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 23:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your follow-up and the note on my talkpage. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Good job. Looks adequate for GA. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)