Talk:It's Time (Australian campaign)/Archives/2016
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Requested move 20 July 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Withdrawn (non-admin closure)Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 08:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
– Primary topic. The song has the most views out of all listed for "It's Time" Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 06:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 28 July 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. There is consensus that the Australian campaign is not the primary topic. -- Tavix (talk) 04:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
– This does not seem to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. For one thing, there was an equivalent "It's Time" campaign in New Zealand the same year. Both articles only receive a fraction of the page views among ambiguous articles;[1] they are not "much more likely" to be the topic sought. Cúchullain t/c 13:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support per nom. There does not seem to be a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support this topic does not seem to have enough long-term significance to make up for its low page views. SSTflyer 06:10, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree with the statement regarding the long-term significance; the success and legacy sections of the article show that the phrase is still in common use in Australia 40-50 years later. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 04:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- But not outside of Australia. Unreal7 (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Also, the fact that the phrase may still be used to refer to the topic does not mean that this political campaign is a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the term. This is not a question of whether a topic is notable or remaining in common use, but rather a question of whether the topic is so much more important to readers than the other topics that use the same term that it should be considered an overwhelmingly dominant meaning for a term. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Slogan is not the primary topic any more. Unreal7 (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.