Talk:Isidore van Kinsbergen/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS):
    • Lead could be longer
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    • The whole artcile relies on three sources, can no more be found?
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    • I will pass this but improvements could be made. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]