Talk:Internet as a source of prior art
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction paragraph
The introduction paragraph does not read as though this article is from an encyclopedia, and should be reworded. It should begin with the title of the article. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 16:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- I have modified the introduction paragraph. Thanks. --Edcolins 17:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
There's too much jargon here for a general readership
Just my opinion.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 21:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Please could you be more specific.. What is unclear? I am ready to help and insert more explanation, but I would need more information. Thanks. --Edcolins 20:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- I have expanded the background section and removed the "confusion" tag for now. --Edcolins 21:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- It just doesn't read that smoothly for me, although maybe it was just my state of mind at the time that made me tag it like that.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 00:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Graphic
Is the graphic really relevant?--Nowa (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Could we find something better? A search report or information disclosure statement (or both) citing an internet page possibly? --Edcolins (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)