Talk:Internet Standard

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as High-importance).

Internet Top‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2021 and 13 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lng93, Kiwiorwiki, Cervonne, Bz191, Mb1821.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article page should be cross referenced to .....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_standards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.236.52.193 (talk • contribs)

The standard notation is Web standards. Write a reasonable text, but note that Web standards are generally not Internet standards. --Alvestrand 18:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Draft standard

I've reinserted the deleted subsection, because existing old DS retain that status, and there are some special rules for existing DS in RFC 6410. If the IESG promotes all DS to STD in 2013-10 the section can be removed; for now it is still relevant. –82.113.99.141 (talk) 09:12, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think that info belongs under the heading Standardization process, that should describe the current process, not previous documents. What was wrong with putting this under History?--Cybjit (talk) 20:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

STD 1 is obsolete

I recently stumbled across [RFC 7100]. Perhaps this wiki page should be updated to reflect that there no longer is something like a STD 1, but rather that the dynamic list of the RFC editor is now the point of reference? 46.237.220.231 (talk) 14:54, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Internet Standard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110719170211/http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcxx00.html to http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcxx00.html#STDbySTD

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]