Talk:International Sleep Products Association
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Fair use rationale for Image:Nabm 4c logo.jpg
Image:Nabm 4c logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
New edits/citations added to correct promotional nature of this page
I've added citations from third-party publications about the work and history of the association
Also, deleted/edited a lot of the blatantly promotional copy in the article
do you think it merits removal of warnings at top, yet?
if not, what else does this entry need? treehugger talk 18:18, 8 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Treehugger87 (talk • contribs)
Removed entry warnings abt citations & advertising tone
Did further edits of entry to remove the promotional nature of piece. And added citations to 3rd party sources, previously.
Would like input as to impartiality of the piece as it currently exists treehugger87 (talk) 13:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)