Talk:Infadels

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments

To whom it may concern - i don't understand why the page is marked for speedy deletion. the band have an album out that got to no. 1 in the dance charts, they are a regular on TV and radio. 2 of their songs have been used for TV adverts and one member of the band already has his own page on wikipedia anyway!!!

Hmm. As I am a keen listener of Radio 2, I should know about them. Yet I've never heard about them, neither have I heard about them on Newround. Could you give proof they were on these places? J.J.Sagnella 20:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm dickweed of course they fuckin exist. You listen to radio 2 so that makes you a music expert does it? I know you made this comment before they got big, but thats not excuse for being such a shit shoveler.
I suspect J.J.Sagnella misread the phrase "...a regular on TV and radio. 2 of their songs..." to mean they were on Radio 2, which knowing this band's music is quite unlikely. Personally I don't think making a mistake like that really deserves the label "shit shoveller", but maybe that's just me. 31.55.40.156 (talk) 21:33, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


hi J.J, thanks for responding. i've included some links below from reputable sources so that you know the band exist these include national newspapers and national radio. hope this solves the problem.

The Independent. review of last london gig - http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/music/reviews/article355318.ece

The Sun. review of last london gig - http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2004580002-2006140407,00.html

BBC. interviews: http://www.bbc.co.uk/jersey/content/articles/2005/10/07/infadels_interview_feature.shtml

BBC6 playlist for Tom Robinson's January 16th show - http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/shows/tom_robinson/tracklisting_20060116.shtml (note 3 infadel tracks)

BBC6 playlist for Steve Lamacq - Monday 24th April - http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/shows/steve_lamacq/tracklisting.shtml?y=2006&d=20060424 Steve played "love like semtex" which is due for release in June.

3 Mobile (advert using infadels song) - http://www.visit4info.com/details.cfm?adid=17506&bp=/search/?pg=charts&l=cmpick watch the advert then got to: http://www.cmumusicnetwork.co.uk/interviews/infadels.html to read an interview with the band discussing the advert.

Atari (advert using infadels song) - go to the following link, select UK, then "videos". video 6 entitled "can't get enough" uses the Infadels song of the same name - http://www.atari.com/driver/

Channel 4 and ipod advert . the band played live on T4 earlier this year(will have to check date) i have the vid on my harddrive but can't find a reference to it from channel 4 website. however the website has the video for Cubicle, the ipod advert Song written and sung by Bnann from Infadels. it clearly makes reference to the band - http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/t4/stars/rinocerose.html

Amazon.co.uk sell all infadels albums and singles as do all other major retailers. http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/search-handle-form/026-7588185-3772442. HMV - http://www.hmv.co.uk/hmvweb/simpleSearch.do?pGroupID=-1&simpleSearchString=infadels&primaryID=-1

there are even sites selling ringtones of infadels songs. here's one selling an appalling syth version of "can't get enough" - http://www.web2txt.co.uk/polyphonic-ringtones-new.php?toneid=35407 i hope we both agree that it is only worth a company paying to use a track, paying to programme a version of and sell the track as a ringtone if they think there is a reasonable market out there!

The band are unlikely to ever be played on bbc radio 2 as it's the wrong kind of playlist! While Infadels were played as backing music to a report on the BBC children's news programme "Newsround" the BBC doesn't publish names of the songs they use. HOWEVER here is a link to an article stating that Newsround used their song - http://www.uk-fusion.com/content/view/1219/30/

A google search for the band or a google image search for the band gives pages and pages of results.

I can provide more links if necessary. please let me know.

After Doing an amazon search, I have to agree this band is definitely notable and should definitely stay. J.J.Sagnella 06:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to change the name to Infadels? They dropped the "The" after their first release of Can't Get Enough (Dead 002) - not the WOS release. So they have therefore released most of their stuff under the name of Infadels. Check out the discogs.com pages for scans etc if you want confirmation. Infadels Discogs.com Page - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.7.93 (talkcontribs) 07:00, 18 May 2006

I was thinking the same thing, particularly seeing as the album is called We Are Not The Infadels ;) The article uses Infadels, so it makes sense to change it. I have taken the liberty of making the move. - Nzd (talk) 10:59, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a picture of The Infadels I took in Brest (France) one month ago. That's the first time I add a picture, I hope here's no problem...

--ELOdry 15:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I've just restored the page to an earlier version after it was sabotaged by "Biffo the Bear". Not funny. - Paul**, 9 Feb 07

Now added a Trivia section and started to try and input references. --Paul** 18:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

This article is tagged as lacking sources, but I can't see any statements that would come under this in its current form. Should the tag be removed?

Fair use rationale for Image:Infadels Love Like Semtex.jpg

Image:Infadels Love Like Semtex.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Infadels Jagger '67.jpg

Image:Infadels Jagger '67.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Infadels Girl That Speaks No Words.jpg

Image:Infadels Girl That Speaks No Words.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Infadels Can't Get Enough.jpg

Image:Infadels Can't Get Enough.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Infadels - We are not the infadels.jpg

Image:Infadels - We are not the infadels.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weasel words / lack of citations

I feel that the bio section sounds more like an official piece of PR. E.g: "The band is known for its frenetic live shows and a work ethic that saw them rack up over 300 performances across 3 continents in less than 3 years." - citations should be added or the text should be removed.Tomclarke (talk) 14:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What happened

to the guys ever since? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.11.199.108 (talk) 20:32, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


dunno.... I saw them fairly early in their career, at the monarch in camden. I'd gone there on spec, not knowing who was playing, & the first person I saw was alex's dad, bill bruford, on his own. I struck up conversation with him & watched the band with him, both of us clutching pints & cigs. those were different times. fallout from this meeting, btw, was the video release of bruford senior's "rock goes to college" appearance, which I told him I'd got a copy of via a mate at the bbc; we exchanged details so I could get a vhs to him & when he'd recovered from his "embarrassment", it was licensed to voiceprint. someone will be along in a minute to tidy this up & tell me (again) that this is not what talk pages are for. do us a favour- wind your neck in, go do some tidying where it's really needed. duncanrmi (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]