Talk:Incendiary kite
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WP:COMMONNAME
I don’t think this is the most frequently used term to describe it. Some articles describe the kite as a firebomb, but very few call it “firebomb kite”. Onceinawhile (talk) 23:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Incendiary kite may be a bit better.Seraphim System (talk) 23:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- When I created the article - Firebomb kite one the google test. I agree incidenary kite wins now. Moving. Both are however used (e.g. [1]).Icewhiz (talk) 06:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
"arguably a war crime"
This phrase is wikipedians' original research based on the documents quoted. While it is arguably true, a wikipedian is not in a position to draw this condlusion. Please associate this phrase with a reliable source. 00:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Military history articles needing attention to referencing and citation
- Military science, technology, and theory articles needing attention to referencing and citation
- Weaponry articles needing attention to referencing and citation
- Military history articles needing attention only to referencing and citation
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles