Talk:Implicit memory

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 April 2020 and 20 July 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Joseph Tejada Vera.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Process Disassociation

This section's write up is unclear in tying the noted experimental example (written clearly enough) to Process Disassociation itself. So the experiment is noted, but it is not shown to have any connection with the defined term (hence the experiment's result is moot under the current write up.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.56.138.126 (talk) 13:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should the history of implicit memory section have the word poop on the end?

-- It would be good if someone dealt with the various implicit learning literature (e.g. Lewicki, Reber, Broadbent, Shanks, Cosmides, Cleeremans, etc.). Alternately, it might be a good idea to start an implicit learning article, and perhaps to reconcile this article with the article on tacit knowledge. 69.130.16.202 15:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Impenetrable sentence

"This result indicates that the mechanism which allows for long-term declarative memory does not have a similar effect on implicit memory." --> doesn't seem to parse. Anybody out there who knows what this means, please rewrite... I would, if I only could. Untrue Believer (talk) 00:35, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Current research

The current research section starts with a quote from 1987. Not very current. If anybody has more knowledge & sources about current research than I do, please be bold and edit! Lova Falk talk 18:25, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

not only that, but it's pretty confusing. First, there's two theories. But then it's two approaches. Then it tries to explain the first one, which is, to 'define a characteristic'. And then there's this sentence that seems out of place. Then it talks about the second theory-or-approach; it tells you what it isn't, then tells you it depends on a lot of things. then the paragraph ends. It's pretty dizzy. OsamaBinLogin (talk) 02:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The psychoanalysis bit is VERY tenuous. And whoever wrote it can't even spell "fantasy". Out of 3 short paragraphs, the longest paragraph is on widely discredited Freudian theories? Not good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.60.16.47 (talk) 14:31, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manipulation

Can we have information in here about how this can/has been used by the media to bias a populace? I mean, I'm not trying to create some controversy or become a nutjob or anything, but it's pretty obvious the effects this form of manipulation could have... Bumblebritches57 (talk) 23:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Implicit memory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Very elderly list of references. It's as though nothing has happened this century. Tony (talk) 08:12, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implicit memory -Semiotics connected?

Implicit memory is being partially weaned-of from main “memory”according to anatomical site and also studytools (WP article).Expert article is needed for any connection with semiotics.M K Mani muttappillil (talk) 06:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Human Cognition SP23

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2023 and 15 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ZZakh23 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by ZZakh23 (talk) 23:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Implicit_memory"