Talk:Ico/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This looks like a very good article. You do a good job of orienting the reader who is not a game player (me). I will make some comments now and make more later if I see the need. I don't see any major problems. —Mattisse (Talk) 03:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • All titles in the footnotes should be sentence capitalization. No all capes.
  • There are some prose issue (issues in wording). I can either try to fix them myself or list them here, or a combination, whatever you prefer. Let me know what you want.
That's all I see for now (but I am tired!)
Save for the "ICO"/"NICO" titles, I fixed the other all-caps sections. Feel free to review the text yourself, any copyedit help is appreciated. --MASEM 15:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Very clearly written, so a non-game player like me can understand it. b (MoS): No apparent MoS violations
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on article subject
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Neutral
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Excellent job! —Mattisse (Talk) 00:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]