Talk:IUCN Red List conservation dependent species

Why this appears to be a copyright violation directly in opposition to owner's intent

The terms on www.iucnredlist.org/info/terms-of-use strongly suggest this is copyrighted material that cannot be largely copied by Wikipedia:

"The Red List contains copyrighted material and/or other proprietary information and thus, are protected by intellectual property agreements and copyright laws and regulations worldwide. You are hereby granted a license to use, download and print the materials contained in The Red List solely for conservation purposes, scientific analyses, or research provided that such use is in accordance with this User Agreement."

and

"You agree to not alter or remove any copyright symbol or other identification concerning authorship of any of the materials contained on or otherwise made available to you in The Red List."

Piano non troppo (talk) 19:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

This is just a list which should help other wikipidians to create and improve articles on threatened species by showing them what are the articles not created, nothing else. I do not see it as a copyright violation. You should see it as a check tool, showing what are the missing informations.You can't just categorize articles, you need a page which list all articles that we should have in order to create the missing one.I just admit one thing, that kind of list is extremly long and can sometime be hard to edit, but I don't not see an other way to do it with wikipedia. - Galmicmi (talk) 21:21, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IUCN Red List conservation dependent species. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org/ to http://www.iucnredlist.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)