Talk:ISO 965

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Delete Objection

Many thanks for the feedback. The article has been revised with additional third-party references within Wikipedia Articles as well as external Links. Shmilyshy 07:26, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The ISO link is not a third-party link, but rather a first party reference, which doesn't qualify for notability. The second link only mentions ISO 965 in passing, so I don't feel that asserts notability either. Please find a third party reference that directly deals with ISO 965 to assert notability. Wizard191 (talk) 13:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there are 3 third-party links added for further reference on notability and application of ISO 965 series. Shmilyshy 06:44, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re deletion and suggested addition.

I came to this page through wiki search. This appears to be the specific information I was after. What are the standard thread sizes M4, M5 etc. So I suggest this page is useful.

There was a time when wiki was a way to hold together technical information. It has long since become a global encylopedia, but the old technical reference is still a very important role in my view.

Suggestion: This article needs a diagram of a screw with the names of the dimensions in the table indicated. Where and what they are. I do not know much about screws or technical engineering, but I do need to find the correct dimensions screw for this project of mine.

Thanks. CofE001 12:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizenofearth001 (talkcontribs)

ISO 965 is only in relation to the tolerances of the screw, not all of the dimensions. For that see ISO metric screw thread. Wizard191 (talk) 19:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decimal notation

This is just for clarity. ISO bolts specifications come directly from the German DIN standard that uses comma decimal separator. ISO form on decimal notation allows either . or , But, for English readers, decimal notation is of the form 1.5 which is used on the left and not 1,5 which could be misinterpreted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.216.245 (talk) 09:12, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Errors

The table of coarse threads limits contains some strange numbers :

  • M1.2 major diameter >= 0.033
  • M2.5 major diameter 2,180..2,080 (guess that was from M2.2)

Kshibliou (talk) 16:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]