Talk:Hurricane Emily (1987)/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I have read through the article and find that it meets the good article criteria. I made a few copy editing changes which you are free to change if I erred.

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers major aspects b (focused): Remains focused
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Neutral
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass

Congratulations!

—Mattisse (Talk) 18:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Hurricane_Emily_(1987)/GA1"