Talk:House of Commons Disqualification Act 1975
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
primarysources
I'm removing the primarysources tag. This act is uncommonly to the point. It doesn't require much by way of interpretation (and zero legal knowledge) to read the list of disqualified people and see it verifies the article.
“ | Our policy: Primary sources that have been reliably published ... may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them. ... Without a secondary source, a primary source may be used only to make descriptive claims, the accuracy of which is verifiable by a reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge. | ” |
This use of primary material seems totally in compliance with the policy.Bazj (talk) 17:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Automatically assessed Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles