Talk:Hortus Cliffortianus

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WAS a masterpiece?

But is no longer a masterpiece? Isn't the timelessness of a masterpiece part of why we call it a masterpiece? Is this bit of literature no longer a masterpiece, or is it simply no longer?134.29.231.11 (talk) 16:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. 134.29.231.11 (talk) 18:04, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hortus Cliffortianus

WAS a masterpiece?

Navigation menu

Search