Talk:Horsham Museum

Guidebook?

The article is more like a guidebook to the museum than an encyclopedic entry. My concerns are:

• Excessive detail which when it is referenced mainly relies on primary sources.
• One (or two) major contributors who may have a conflict of interest, maybe they could state any COI they may have?
• Some of the text addresses readers directly in an unencyclopedic tone.

It would be good to get some feedback from other editors before I make any major changes. Having said all this I believe with a bit of colabiration this could be a very good article. Grim²³★ 14:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Agree with all the above--I tagged this for coi and detail some few days ago. A major rewrite and pruning of non-essential and inadequately sourced information would be most constructive. 99.168.81.164 (talk) 16:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Horsham Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070212105722/http://www.horshammuseum.org/information/information_2293.asp to http://www.horshammuseum.org/information/information_2293.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121227143421/http://www.sussexmuseums.co.uk/find/museum.asp?ID=10 to http://www.sussexmuseums.co.uk/find/museum.asp?ID=10
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081021004933/http://www.horsham.gov.uk/leisure_and_tourism/leisure_2705.asp to http://www.horsham.gov.uk/leisure_and_tourism/leisure_2705.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)