Talk:Hill–Burton Act
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
Text states: "This act responded to the first of Truman’s proposals and was designed to provide federal grants and guaranteed loans to improve the physical plant of the nation’s hospital system"
Should this read: "This act responded to the first of Truman’s proposals to improve the physical plant of the nation’s hospital system by providing federal grants and guaranteed loans"? If not, could some one clarify: the first of which proposals?
Thanks, flatrockdam 04:53, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
This sentence captures a general sentiment and could be updated to exclude antiquated language, see first paragraph of linked book RubyU235 (talk) 14:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Probably an unnecessary sentence, bills inherently provide funding RubyU235 (talk) 14:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Free care
This article does not provide enough detail about the free medical care currently made available under the act. — C M B J 04:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Why would we mention current free care (called uncompensated care in healthcare organizations). Yes, as of today, The IRS does have stipulations in place for not-for-profit organization to provide a certain amount of uncompensated care. RubyU235 (talk) 14:55, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Certificate of Need
This article does not discuss the subsequent history of the legislation. For instance, the Act was folded into the Public Health Service Act. Titles A and B of the 1966 amendments to Public Health Service Act provided enabling legislation for state level Certificate of Need legislation. A fairly good survey of the legislative history is given in the introduction to an article published in 2009 in the American Journal of Managed Care ((Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(10):737-744)).--Tweedye (talk) 21:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
I added a consequences section where this could fit nicely above or below. RubyU235 (talk) 14:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
It also seems this would make for a history of healthcare delivery and not necessarily relational to the HBA RubyU235 (talk) 14:59, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Like it never ends, then we get to talking about PPS when we should be talking impacts and outcomes RubyU235 (talk) 15:00, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
And if you have access to the journal… most won’t, I don’t, yet, I requested it RubyU235 (talk) 15:07, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hill–Burton Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051120163211/http://www.hrsa.gov/osp/dfcr/about/aboutdiv.htm to http://www.hrsa.gov/osp/dfcr/about/aboutdiv.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)