This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetictree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Protista, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of protists and protistology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ProtistaWikipedia:WikiProject ProtistaTemplate:WikiProject ProtistaProtista articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Would it be appropriate to add "unicellular" to the description? The images look like a complex organism, and searching elsewhere doesn't easily answer the question of whether this is a multicellular organism. Peter (talk) 17:43, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think that is generally a good idea, as it is a common question readers want to answer. Finding a source may be difficult though. --Nessie (talk) 17:56, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Added. The linked articles (especially Foissner) cover the organism's morphology pretty well, so there's no need to hunt up any new links. Deuterostome (Talk) 14:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
_02.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}