Talk:Hebden, North Yorkshire/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GAR.Pyrotec (talk) 11:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Initial review - On hold

The article is readable and is reasonably referenced. However, I'm putting the article On Hold:

• The WP:lead is intended to be an short introduction and summary of the article. It should not contain referenced information that does not appear elsewhere in the article; and should not contain in-line citations.
• The article "fails" mostly on WP:Verify
• The History section includes statements about planned village and Tofts that are unreferenced. Similarly, a cotton mill; remodelling of the village and conversion of back lane in high street; opening of railway line; Ibbotson Institute.
• The Geography section is unreferenced apart from the last paragraph.
• In the Landmarks section, the Dales Way and lead mining remains are unreferenced.
• Possibly,the list of unreferenced statements is longer than this.Pyrotec (talk) 12:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

GAR

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   Article has been much improved since the initial review

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Good citations

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   A Good Article