Talk:Heathenry (new religious movement)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ThorLives (talk · contribs) 07:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

I have made many complaints on the talk page, but the main problem is neutrality. The article, as presently constituted, draws almost exclusively from the work of left-wing Norse pagans, many (like Dr. Snook) have been expelled from mainline groups such as the Asatru Folk Assembly. I attached a tag challenging the neutrality of the article, but it was deleted by the same person who rewrote the entire article and then nominated the piece as a "good article."

The present article also contains many errors of fact. I would correct them, but my edits on this article have all been deleted by the person who rewrote it. Example: the word for one of the souls is typically hugr--not hugh. (Norse pagans use Old Norse terms)

--ThorLives (talk) 07:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

As has already been said at GAN1, you are simply unsuitable to conduct this review. By commenting on the GAN2 page you have initiated yourself as the reviewer. In frustration, I will re-nominate the article for a third time. Do not comment on it, thus initiating the review, this time. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)