Talk:HMS Hindustan (1903)/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 17:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Will look at this one. —Ed!(talk) 17:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)
  1. It is reasonably well written:
    Pass Dab links, dup links and external links tools all show no problems. Copyvio tool returns green.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:
    Pass Offline sources accepted in good faith, checks of Google Books return results generally in line with article content.
  3. It is broad in its coverage:
    Not yet
    • Any idea of unit cost for ships of the class? Also when the budget for construction was authorized?
    • See my comment on the Commonwealth review on unit cost, and the King Edward VIIs were ordered under the 1901, 1902, and 1903 estimates, but Burt doesn't give a specific breakdown that I see.
    • "Grand Fleet commander, Admiral John Jellicoe, ordered Bradford to take the 3rd Battle Squadron" -- No first reference to Bradford.
    • Fixed
    • "during which a German U-boat attacked the battleships but failed to score a hit.[13]" -- any idea which one? Can be a footnote if not clear.
    • No, unfortunately
    • "and collided with and badly damaged the destroyer HMS Wrestler in May 1918." -- Should note if no damage to this ship, and any damage to Wrestler.
    • Clarified that Hindustan was not damaged
    • Should be a mention of if there were any battle honours, or none if applicable.
    • Nothing I've seen in Burt or elsewhere.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:
    Pass No problems there.
  5. It is stable:
    Pass No problems there.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
    Pass Four images cited to PD or CC where appropriate.
  7. Other:
    On Hold Pending a few fixes. —Ed!(talk) 17:59, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks again, Ed. Parsecboy (talk) 14:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pass All of this works. As is the article meets the GA criteria to me. Well done! —Ed!(talk) 00:30, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]