Talk:Gurl.com/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 22:50, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

  1. Comprehension:
  2. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is good. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) Follows the manual of style. Pass Pass
  3. Verifiability:
  4. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) Inline citations are present. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Sources are mostly reliable. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research is present. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No flagrant copyright violation or plagiarism found. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness:
  6. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) Covers all major aspects in fair depth. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) Addresses the topic directly without deviations. Pass Pass
  7. Neutrality:
  8. Notes Result
    No neutrality issues were found. Pass Pass
  9. Stability:
  10. Notes Result
    No edit warring or content disputes. Pass Pass
  11. Illustration:
  12. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) Tags and fair use rationales are appropiate. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Captions and use of images are appropiate. Pass Pass

Comments

Tayi Arajakate Talk 03:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]