Talk:Groucho glasses
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Used as an actual prosthetic?
I saw on history channel, the damaged face of a union soldier was cleaned up then covered with something that looked very similar to the groucho glasses (included a nose because his was practically gone), can anyone confirm that? TMV943 (talk) 06:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
they're not called groucho glasses
the name has to be changed 67.167.12.238 (talk) 23:29, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed -- and what is your alternative proposed article title? AnonMoos (talk) 15:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- I always heard them called "schnozz glasses" (growing up in the western US in the 1980s). But "Groucho glasses" does seem to be the most common name for them on Google. --2404:130:0:1000:C43F:BAE9:AE46:73E1 (talk) 04:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Groucho glasses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051215075140/http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-19990901-000042.html to http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-19990901-000042.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 24 October 2017 (UTC)