Talk:Grey Literature International Steering Committee

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Untitled

The "Guidelines for the production of scientific and technical reports: how to write and distribute grey literature" available under www.glisc.info should not be used freely as a whole, but only in part, as specified below. In fact, the free use of the Guidelinews would destroy them as a validated tool. On the contrary, information on the GLISC itself, that is the collective author of the guidelines, is free.

"I hereby affirm that I represent the Copyright Holder of the GLISC (Grey Literature International Steering Committee) which is the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of "The Guidelines for the production of scientific and technical reports: how to write and distribute grey literature" located online at www.glisc.info ]. I agree to publish only that part of that Guidelines, namely the "Statement of Purpose" under the free license CC-by-SA version 3.0. I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the above part of the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Paola De Castro on behalf of GLISC "Grey Literature International Steering Committee"

(Chicon59 (talk) 22:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Please undo the deletion tag.

(Chicon59 (talk) 22:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

The merging from GLISC and GreyNet is an error. These are two independent international structures working in the same domain. (Chicon59 (talk) 07:27, 7 September 2009 (UTC)) There is no problem with copyright and intellectual property because the authors of the GLISC website authorized the use of some parts of their text. (Chicon59 (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Ok, we'll try to integrate secondary sources into the article asap. (Chicon59 (talk) 11:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Grey Literature International Steering Committee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]