Talk:Graveyard Mountain Home

Graveyard Mountain Home has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 30, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Graveyard Mountain Home/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 00:58, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dead links to fix

Unfortunately, the Transcending the Mundane interview and review have been offline since early September and look unlikely to come back online. I can't find any archived versions of the pages at archive.org, so I'll have to go through and delete everything which relies on those sources. Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CK GraveydMntnHome.jpg needs a source Done Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

First paragraph should be merged into another Done Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You need to cover all sections in the lead, including composition Done Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Make clear that Ghost Book is the name of the soundtrack, not the film Done Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Background

Theron Patterson does not need linking Done Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"InsideOut Records offered to sign Moore to their label." → rewrite Done Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

This section doesn't really cover the composition of the album, it is more of an extension to the background section. Focus on musical genres and styles and lyrics

Moved the paragraph on personnel to the Background section; the rest of the information should fit in Composition. Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"plan to record an "organic, and less digital"[1] album," - place ref after comma

In a previous GAR, I was told that cites must go directly after quotes finished. Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link chord progression

Paragraph removed - source offline. Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remove red links as they are not notable people Done Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
""an extreme"[4] of his work," - ref after comma

See above. Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Release and promotion

Good work here

Reception

Unlink Millenia Nova Done Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
'Anderson described the music as "at times is funky in a glitchy, herky-jerky sort of way..."' - this incorporated quote is grammatically incorrect Done Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"there were some "traditional"[8] songs on the album," = ref after comma

See response in Composition section. Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing

Source for writers?

Isn't it common sense where the sources for writers, personnel, and the track listing itself are from? I've done a few album GAs now and this hasn't been an issue, but I can add the if you like.

It is up to you, however I have always thought that it makes sense to source things like this, and it avoids disputes later on. There is the template {{cite music release notes}} designed for this purpose. Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if that's how you want it formatted, but I've added the sources in for this and the personnel section. Una Laguna^Talk 17:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can incorporate the additional writers of songs into the extra_column field in {{track listing}}

There are so few additional writers that I figured an extra column, which would mostly be empty, would be unnecessary. Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel

Source?

See track listing section. Una Laguna^Talk 17:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

Make sure that only works in print are italicised, (ie websites should not be)

Done Una Laguna^Talk 17:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Official site - official site of what? Done Una Laguna^Talk 15:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll place the review on hold until improvements are made. Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:28, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work - passed now. Adabow (talk · contribs) 19:55, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your thorough review! :) Una Laguna^Talk 23:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Graveyard Mountain Home. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090327114157/http://www.chromakey.com/video/kmmtv.mp4 to http://www.chromakey.com/video/kmmtv.mp4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]