Talk:Get-rich-quick scheme/Archives/2013
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Untitled
The following entries are incorrect, and biased.
"Multi-level marketing is potentially highly profitable for those who first start the scheme". Incorrect - it is also possible for those who join many years later to receive a good income if they have sufficient talent and work habits, just as in any other business.
"However, it is mathematically implausible that all the participants in a multi-level marketing scheme will all become rich from selling to one another". Incorrect - A legitimate MLM company will have products which are for sale to end consumers. This sentence confuses a legitimate MLM company with an illegal pyramid scheme.
"Usually, the lowest tiers of the scheme end up losing money." Incorrect - It is quite possible for any tier in an MLM company to lose money if they have greater expenditure than income, just as in any business. The ability of an individual to earn or lose money depends on thier own talent, ability and application regardless of the tier they have joined.
Whatever people's views on Network Marketing, these entries are factually incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.179.133 (talk) 17:46, 5 October 2006
Suggested edits
Removed a dead link 84.64.61.206 04:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
No offense but it seems the word "maxim" is out of place here... I mean, I know what it means- it just seemed awkwardly placed on a public encyclopedia. --71.194.128.49 07:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Someone should put a picture here resembling an example so others can use.Andygusgs (talk) 23:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)