Talk:Genpet

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Genpet article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cleanup

First of all there's a huge POV quote that takes up half the article. Yes, it's a quote, but it's still POV and a little too long. Also, it's not readily identifiable as a quote. I think it should at least be summarized and made NPOV.

Actually, I guess that's all. --Ortzinator 14:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly agree. The entire quote should be summarized in one or two sentences. WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a soapbox. --Satori Son 14:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since no objections or other comments, I have removed both the quote and cleanup tag for now. A brief, neutrally presented summary of the quote would also be appropriate. -- Satori Son 22:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to add a summary later, he's got a long artist statment Satori...

-Josh

Talk:Genpet

Cleanup

Navigation menu

Search