Talk:Gender discrimination in India
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
It appears to me that this article needs to be merged with Sexism in India Teashias (talk) 04:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC) i dont think so that it should be changed iti perfect — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.66.90.5 (talk) 15:52, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Article was not-well worded, had many errors and incorrect grammar. Made some minor changes. May still require a review. Also, a lot of new developments in Indian legal scenario are not updated isoham (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Citations are needed for the first section and section on discrimination against men. Jyothsna01 (talk) 09:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)J
Suggestion to delete article
This article has a lot of problems and covers the same topic as the "Gender inequality in India" article (formerly "Sexism in India"), which is very comprehensive, very well sourced, and well-written. I suggest that this article be deleted. BerikG (talk) 22:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed. Very badly written — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.199.162 (talk • contribs) 09:49, 22 November 2014
'Discrimination Against Men'
It could be argued that IPC 498A merits inclusion in this article. However, at the time of removal, there was only one reliable source attached to three paragraphs (a Wall Street Journal post). There was a minor, non-neutral blog as the only other reference. If people want to re-insert it in a neutral and well-referenced manner then that's great - but it must conform to the same standards as the rest of this site. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gender discrimination in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323144704/https://members.weforum.org/pdf/gendergap/IGGR09.pdf to https://members.weforum.org/pdf/gendergap/IGGR09.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130110225116/http://www.thp.org:80/where_we_work/south_asia/india/research_reports/chronic_hunger_and_status_of_women to http://www.thp.org/where_we_work/south_asia/india/research_reports/chronic_hunger_and_status_of_women
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.cwwl.org/media/Groundbreakers_FINAL.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 8 January 2017 (UTC)