Talk:Gammarus roeseli

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2019 and 29 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dmcortes. Peer reviewers: Jackson48, Rlucia98.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

edits

Hello Stemonitis, I think that your edit of Gammarus roeselii was very bad. It removed more information that it benefit. There CAN be listed countries of distribution as it is for example in featured article Jaguar. Your edit was against Wikipedia:Editing_policy "... try to preserve information". (And I do not agree with your note User talk:Stemonitis/Archive11#Animal distribution. There can be mentioned even Liechtenstein if it is at the margin of distribution area.) I have even improved simple list with capitulations of areas (western, central and southern Europe), but you still do not like it. And you have destroyed useful information about alien species. --Snek01 18:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, I did overstep the mark, slightly. I removed one small piece of information, but that's all. The vast majority remained, and that which was taken away was only due to my oversight. The fact remains that a raw listing of presence and absence data is not the purpose of an encyclopaedia, which is to provide a summary, ideally from secondary sources. The raw data is still available through the (now single) link to Fauna Europea. If the species is known to be invasive, then that should be added, but not as a footnote in a table. Unfortunately, your source doesn't provide that information. I have found a better source, and added the relevant information. --Stemonitis 18:25, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gammarus roeseli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]