Talk:GJ 3634/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: XavierGreen (talk) 06:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems near GA-class but needs some minor adjustments before reaching it.

The sentences where i have placed citation tags need citations, any information in the lead that is not mentioned in the body needs to be cited.
- Done --Starstriker7^(Talk) 06:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In the section naming and discovery i would combine the first and second paragraphs together as well as the third and fourth together.
- Done --Starstriker7^(Talk) 06:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The year the star was discovered should be mentioned (you state the year the planet was discovered but not the star).

Done With the year the star was first referenced by, well, anybody. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 06:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you put GJ_3634B as discovered in 1984, didnt you mean GJ_3634 was discovered in 1984?.XavierGreen (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yes I did. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 21:58, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It might also help to state some other features nearby to familiarize the reader with its location, for example what is the nearest star to it, is it within the local bubble?
- I don't think I can find the nearest star in a reference anywhere. However, I could compare its distance with that of a better-known star. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 06:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That would do.