Talk:Free Churro

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Free Churro/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Plot

Production

Reception

References

Progress

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

DYK nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk04:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed: Jake Funk
  • Comment: Getting in just under the wire. I know what I'm doing.

Improved to Good Article status by Kncny11 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article was promoted to GA on 2 March, long enough, neutral, referenced and no copyvio obvious. The hooks are interesting and referenced. Images used the article are either free or fair use. QPQ done. Corachow (talk) 20:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]