Talk:Fortnite Festival
 | Fortnite Festival is currently a Video games good article nominee. Nominated by λ NegativeMP1 at 01:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: 2023 video game |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
Track List
Shouldn’t there be a list of the currently available Jam Tracks in Fortnite Festival? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.163.189 (talk) 10:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- On the one hand, the list of tracks is 10k, and the remaining prose is 9k. That does make it the bulk of the article. On the other hand, comparable games like the Rock Band series have lists of tracks—although in that case, the main articles and lists are long enough that the lists are split off. @Rusty4321 and NegativeMP1: What are your thoughts on this? The list is in line with what's in comparable articles; put it inline, split to a separate list, or do you have other concerns? —C.Fred (talk) 11:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think making it a separate list sounds good since the Jam Tracks are also usable as emotes in other Fortnite modes (STW, BR, Creative) 2A00:23EE:2478:19D8:70C7:AEF4:95DF:6E32 (talk) 11:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- I can work on making a song track for the Wikipedia article, each list of songs will be separated by the season of festival it came out. WrestleLuxury Wiki (talk) 12:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Per WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:GAMECRUFT, no. λ NegativeMP1 12:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Unlike the other rhythm games there's been next to no coverage of the actual tracks so this runs aground of GAMEGUIDE. Masem (t) 13:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- They appear to be making the list anyways despite our comments. λ NegativeMP1 13:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't the Fortnite Festival twitter account post about each upcoming track drop? 5.70.79.57 (talk) 22:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- We avoid content like that sourced only to non independent or first party sources — Masem (t) 23:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- well I find several independent results when I search Fortnite Festival tracks so not sure what you mean 5.70.79.57 (talk) 23:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- We avoid content like that sourced only to non independent or first party sources — Masem (t) 23:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Fortnite Festival/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 01:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: BigLordFlash (talk · contribs) 12:27, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I will review this article. If you have any questions just talk to me on my talk page.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Nothing wrong here. BigLordFlashtalk 12:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- It has a list of all references. BigLordFlashtalk 12:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- No copyright violations (Earwig) BigLordFlashtalk 12:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It is stable. BigLordFlashtalk 12:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- No copyright issues. BigLordFlashtalk 12:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Images have suitable captions. BigLordFlashtalk 12:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
