Talk:Firstborn (Judaism)

Bible Mid‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)

This article seems a very clear case of where Wikipedia conventions need to be applied:

The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources

In ictu oculi (talk) 10:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It should be either Firstborn (Judaism) or Firstborn son (Judaism). Dougweller (talk) 16:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to Google books and JSTOR usage, and SBL Handbook of Style (having mentioned the thing I suppose I'm bound to look at it now) would appear to be the former, which is a bit sexist, since it is largely about sons. But then the article mentions firstborn daughters too, so can get away with it. And bechorim as a collective in moderm Hebrew is gender neutral "first born sons and daughters" In ictu oculi (talk) 11:47, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Other Religions (use English)

I checked the Quran in various translations, and found no reference to an 'implied' suggestions of which son was sacrificed. this is clarified in the text, because when one says "Although not explicitly stated in...", it suggests an IMPLICIT statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.38.43.28 (talk) 20:19, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bechor → Firstborn (Judaism) – Rationale for the proposed page name change per WP:EN sources as per WP:RS in article, checked with usage on Google Books and JSTOR. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Dougweller (talk) 05:10, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Firstborn (Judaism). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3 years

Firstborn sons are redeemed after 30 days, not at three years 174.44.208.189 (talk) 20:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]