Talk:Female perversion

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

There is no cited mention of opposing ideas or responses to this paper these are needed for balance --Nate 11:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article was written by a single individual, relying on a single source that is not recognized as a standard reference in the literature. In addition, the supporting sources would appear, at quick glance to be POV and agenda driven themselves. DashaKat 12:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
just to clarify I agree with the tag & was adding part of the reason --Nate 13:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now, I understand. Good faith. So, let's get to work! DashaKat 16:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]